Microsoft’s search engine Bing has a new visual search feature. It presents you with categories like US politicians, popular celebrities, cell phones, yoga poses, film legends, new cars, dog breeds and more. Drilling in to a category will show a dynamically presented list of thumbnails, which when clicked on will return more text results.

If a particular featured category is exactly what you were looking for – UFC Fighters? – this may be a nice place to bookmark. More generally speaking however I found the whole thing doing rather poorly so far, for a couple of reasons:

  • The result set is not easily searchable. I was presented with a couple of book covers so I typed google above to have it show only covers from books about Google. That would have been kind of neat, but it didn’t work.
  • The scope of data is simply disappointing. When trying to restrict my books exploration to the category “Comics & Graphic Novels” it displayed only a single item (the Watchmen trade paperback). Restricting to a villain type in the category100 Heroes and Villains returns 3 characters (perhaps not surprisingly when you start out with only 100 items). For a time waster this is fun, but at this small scale I don’t yet see long term searching or researching usefulness.
  • The whole thing needs the Microsoft Silverlight plugin to run. On first glance there does not seem to be anything that couldn’t have been done in Flash (perhaps even DHTML), so this seems to be a strategic decision rather than a company pushing the limits of what you can do inside the browser. As such, having to run an executable before seeing results (if you don’t yet have Silverlight installed) hurts usability quite a bit.
  • The data provided in Visual Search is fetched and/or organized not from Bing Search Bots but external third party sites which makes the concept simply bogus. Now whats the purpose of  Bing Search if external companies gonna give us the result which I wont atleast believe on.

    Bing Visual Search

    Bing Visual Search

  • I found myself expecting a larger image when clicking on the thumbnail of an item, but the results were then mostly text only. Perhaps the flow wouldn be interrupted less if a larger image would be appearing next to the results, I’m not sure. But clicking takes us to a normal search result page , if thats what had to open up whats the use of this Service ?

Perhaps next to Microsoft pushing its plugin on me, it’s the context of this being part of a supposedly more generalized search engine that I find disappointing. As a sort of standalone microsite it’s really fun, but when it comes to the major search engines I find scalable approaches more interesting.




About the author

Dr-Hack

Owner and founder of Hackology Internet Security Portal and BlackAngel. These days teach hacking so others can stay safe. Apart from hacking, a Movie Fanatic.Also run a tech Blog, small projects like encrypted paste etc and various PoC and research articles

  • Ugh, I liked! So clear and positively.
    Thank you

  • i think that Bing is not as good as Google. Google would still index new websites faster than Bing. Microsoft would still need a lot of catching to do with GoogleBot.

  • not just some bing need to work alot.giving a gud outlook but nothing in it is not what a search engine is suppose to be… google as i think is the best of search engines available to us.

  • I use both Bing and Google search engine and i dont see much difference in their search results. I use google for searching hard to find academic topics and Bing for general search.

  • I think its more about dominance and market-share… I used Ubuntu and Mac OS X, but I stick to Windows because I am more used to it and think that my needs are fulfilled by Windows 7. Considering that, why would I switch from Windows to Mac OS (or Ubuntu) ?!

    Same goes for search engines. I am familiar and comfortable with Google search engine, why would I switch to Bing if Google is already fulfilling my searching needs ?!

Pin It on Pinterest

Shares